Martello towers are small defensive forts built in several countries of the British Empire during the 19th century, from the time of the Napoleonic Wars onwards. They stand up to 40 feet (12m) high, with two floors, and typically had a garrison of one officer and 15-25 men. Their round structure and thick walls of solid masonry made them resistant to cannon fire, while their height made them an ideal platform for a single heavy artillery piece, mounted on the flat roof and able to traverse a 360 degree arc. A few towers had moats for extra defence. The Martello towers were used during the first half of the 19th century, but became obsolete with the introduction of powerful rifled artillery. Many have survived to the present day, often preserved as historic monuments.
Martello towers were inspired by a round fortress, part of a larger Genovese defence system, at Mortella (Myrtle) Point in Corsica. The designer was Giovan Giacomo Paleari Fratino (el Fratin), and the tower was completed in 1565. -Since the 15th century, the Corsicans had built similar towers at strategic points around the island to protect coastal villages and shipping from North African pirates. The towers stood one or two storeys high and measured 12-15 m in diameter, with a single doorway 5 m off the ground that one could access only via a ladder which the occupants could remove. Local villagers paid for the towers and watchmen, known as torregiani, who would signal the approach of unexpected ships by lighting a beacon fire on the tower's roof. The fire would alert the local defence forces to the threat. Although the pirate threat subsequently dwindled, the Genovese built a newer generation of circular towers that warded off later foreign invasions.
Martello towers are small defensive forts built in several countries of the British Empire during the 19th century, from the time of the Napoleonic Wars onwards
Martello Towers
Martello towers stand up to 40 feet (12m) high, with two floors, and typically had a garrison of one officer and 15-25 men.
Their round structure and thick walls of solid masonry made them resistant to cannon fire, while their height made them an ideal platform for a single heavy artillery piece, mounted on the flat roof and able to traverse a 360 degree arc.
Martello Towers
Since the 15th century, the Corsicans had built similar towers at strategic points around the island to protect coastal villages and shipping from North African pirates. The towers stood one or two storeys high and measured 12-15 m in diameter, with a single doorway 5 m off the ground that one could access only via a ladder which the occupants could remove.
Tower 1 stands 200 feet up on the cliffs above East Wear Bay, Folkestone.
Longitude: 1.198859 - Latitude: 51.09138
GridRef: TR 2410 3732
Monument Number 465762
Tower 2 is about 50 feet lower than No.1, and sited on a small knoll slightly further inland.
Longitude: 1.196939 - Latitude: 51.08839
GridRef: TR 23980 36981
Monument Number 465765
Tower 3 stands on the cliffs above Copt Point, Folkestone and overlooks the harbour below.
Longitude: 1.197861 - Latitude: 51.08521
GridRef: TR 2406 3663
Monument Number 465768
On 7 February 1794, two British warships, HMS Fortitude (74 guns) and HMS Juno (32 guns), unsuccessfully attacked the tower at Mortella Point. The tower eventually fell to land forces, under Sir John Moore, after two days of heavy fighting. What helped the British was that the tower's two eighteen pounders fired sea-ward, while only the one six pounder could fire land-ward.
Martello Towers
A few towers had moats for extra defence. The Martello towers were used during the first half of the 19th century, but became obsolete with the introduction of powerful rifled artillery. Many have survived to the present day, often preserved as historic monuments.
Tower 4, along with its neighbours up to No.9, were all built into deep dry moats, and were situated within the Shorncliffe Camp area.
Longitude: 1.155175 - Latitude: 51.07494
GridRef: TR 2112 3536
Monument Number 465771
Tower 5, along with its neighbours up to No.9, were all built into deep dry moats, and were situated within the Shorncliffe Camp area.
Longitude:1.150297 - Latitude: 51.07669 - GridRef: TR 2077 3554
Monument Number 465774.
Tower 6, along with its neighbours up to No.9, were all built into deep dry moats, and were situated within the Shorncliffe Camp area.
Longitude: 1.142354 - Latitude: 51.07538 - GridRef: TR 2022 3537
Monument Number 465777.
The interior of a classic British Martello tower consisted of three storeys, sometimes with an additional basement. The ground floor served as the magazine and storerooms, where ammunition, stores and provisions were kept. The garrison of 24 men and one officer lived in a casemate on the first floor, which was divided into several rooms and had fireplaces built into the walls for cooking and heating. The officer and men lived in separate rooms of almost equal size.
Martello Towers
The roof or terreplein was surmounted with one or two cannon on a central pivot that enabled the guns to rotate up to 360 degrees. A well or cistern within the fort supplied the garrison with water. An internal drainage system linked to the roof enabled rainwater to refill the cistern.
Timeline Tower 7
Longitude: 1.137181 - Latitude: 51.07489
GridRef: TR 1986 3530
Monument Number 463854
Tower No 8
Longitude: 1.130725 - Latitude: 51.07443
GridRef: TR 1941 3523
Monument Number 463857
Timeline Tower 9
Longitude: 1.125118 - Latitude: 51.07386 - GridRef: TR 1902 3515
Scheduled Monument
During the first half of the 19th century, the British government embarked on a large-scale programme of building Martello towers to guard the British and Irish coastlines. Around 140 were built, mostly along the south coast of England.
Martello Towers
The French built similar towers along their own coastline that they used as platforms for communication by optical telegraphs. The United States government also built a number of Martello towers along the east coast of the US that copied the British design with some modifications.
Timeline Tower 10
Longitude: 1.095878 - Latitude: 51.06789
GridRef: TR 170 344 Monument Number 463976
Timeline Tower 11
Longitude: 1.088502 - Latitude: 51.06647 - GridRef: TR 1649 3422
Demolished
Timelne Tower 12
Longitude: 1.08504 - Latitude: 51.06593 - GridRef: TR 1625 3415
Monument Number 463963
Between 1804 and 1812 the British authorities built a chain of towers based on the original Mortella tower to defend the south and east coast of England, Ireland, Jersey and Guernsey to guard against possible invasion from France, then under the rule of the Emperor Napoleon.
The effectiveness of Britain's Martello towers was never actually tested in combat against a Napoleonic invasion fleet. They were, however, effective in hindering smuggling
After the threat had passed, the Martello towers in England met a variety of fates. The Coastguard took over many to aid in the fight against smuggling. Fifteen were demolished to enable the re-use of their masonry.
Martello Towers
The sea washed thirty away and the military destroyed four in experiments to test the effectiveness of the new rifled artillery. During the Second World War, some Martello towers returned to military service as observation platforms and firing platforms for anti-aircraft artillery.
Timeline Tower 13
Longitude: 1.079536 - Latitude: 51.06473
GridRef: TR 1587 3400
Monument Number 463948
Timeline Tower 14
Longitude: 1.074162 - Latitude: 51.06334
GridRef: TR 1550 3383
Monument Number 463954
Timeline Tower 15
Longitude: 1.069946 - Latitude: 51.06219
GridRef: TR 1521 3369
Monument Number 463960
Forty-seven towers survived in England, a few of which have been restored and transformed into museums, visitor centres, and galleries, some are privately owned or used as private residences; the remainder are derelict.
Martello Towers
A survey of the East Coast towers, in 2007, found that the remaining 17 were in a reasonable condition.
Timeline Tower 16
Longitude: 1.064846 - Latitude: 51.06062
GridRef: TR 1486 3350
Monument Number 464018
Timeline Tower 17
Longitude: 1.05603 - Latitude: 51.05896
GridRef: TR 1425 3329
Monument Number 464021
Timeline Tower 18
Longitude: 1.055051 - Latitude: 51.0571
GridRef: TR 1419 3308
Monument Number 464024
The gunpowder was stored on the ground floor in a specially designed area with ventilation ducts, to keep the gunpowder dry, and double skinned walls. The risk of fire and/or explosion was minimised by protecting the necessary lantern with a glass plate.
Martello Towers
A round brick pillar rose through the center of the tower to support the roof, on which a cannon on a rotating gun carriage could fire in all directions.
Timeline Tower 19
Longitude: 1.050819 - Latitude: 51.05568
GridRef: TR 1390 3291
Monument Number 464027
Timeline Tower 20
Longitude: 1.046409 - Latitude: 51.05373
GridRef: TR 1360 3268
Monument Number 464030
Timeline Tower 21
Longitude: 1.041708 - Latitude: 51.05169
GridRef: TR 1328 3244
Monument Number 464033
The tower has been restored to its original design and layout with almost all of the original tower still in place. Martello Tower No.24 is only one of 3 of the 74 built that is open to the public.
The tower contains almost all of the features of the original design including brickwork, front and parapet doors, window openings, fireplaces, ventilation shafts, the original 24 pounder muzzle-loading cannon on the gun platform, parapet shot lockers, hauling rings, replica gunpowder barrels, and replica 'Brown Bess' muskets.
Martello Towers
Martello tower walls were thicker on the side facing the sea because that was where most enemy fire was expected to come from. The roundness and thickness of the walls were designed to deflect cannonballs, which tests proved they could not penetrate.
Timeline Tower 22
Longitude: 1.015459 - Latitude: 51.03645
GridRef: TR 1151 3067
Monument Number 464012
Timeline Tower 23
Longitude: 1.011634 - Latitude: 51.03466
GridRef: TR 1125 3046
Monument Number 464015
Timeline Tower 24
Longitude: 0.9954089 - Latitude: 51.02419
GridRef: TR 1016 2925
Monument Number 463770
During the Second World War, they were used to spot incoming aircraft and the V1 & V2 flying bombs.
Martello Towers
The towers are made of about half a million bricks, and although the tower looks round, they are fact slightly elliptical, which helped to deflect incoming cannon fire.
Timeline Tower 25
Longitude: 0.9931458 - Latitude: 51.02227
GridRef: TR 1001 2903
Monument Number 463767
Timeline Tower No 26
Longitude: 0.9836911 - Latitude: 51.01496
GridRef: TR 0938 2819
Monument Number 462703
Timeline Tower 27
Longitude: 0.9826352 - Latitude: 51.01184
GridRef: TR 0932 2784
Monument Number 462705
Two redoubts were constructed into the south coast Martello chain to act as supply depots for the local Martellos
Shorncliffe and Eastbourne Redoudts
Two redoubts were constructed into the south coast Martello chain to act as supply depots for the local Martellos, and were originally described as 'eleven-gun towers'.
Two redoubts were constructed into the south coast Martello chain to act as supply depots for the local Martellos, and were originally described as 'eleven-gun towers'. It was originally proposed to build a four-gun tower at Dymchurch.
Eastbourne Redoubt is a circular coastal defence fort at Eastbourne.
GridRef: TR 1550 3383
Monument Number 463954
Shorncliffe Redoubt is a British Napoleonic earthwork fort. The site is approximately 300 feet by 300 feet and is situated on the Kentish Coast in Sandgate, Kent.
Sandgate Casle was converted into a sort of Martello Tower, and meant that a tower did not need to be built on this lower stretch of the coast, the local towers all being high up on the cliffs slightly inland.
Sandgate Castle - Demolition of No.10
Dover Express - Friday 3rd October 1873. Demolition of No. 10
Sandgate Castle was built in 1539 by Henry VIII to defend the lower shore of Sandgate, this was converted into a sort of Martello Tower, and meant that a tower did not need to be built on this lower stretch of the coast, the local towers all being high up on the cliffs slightly inland.
Dover Express - Friday 3rd October 1873. Demolition of No. 10
The Royal Engineers' Experimental Committee attended at Hythe on Monday, and proceeded to carry out their operations against No. 10 Martello Tower...
Martello Towers History
Martello towers were inspired by a round fortress, part of a larger Genovese defence system, at Mortella (Myrtle) Point in Corsica. The designer was Giovan Giacomo Paleari Fratino (el Fratin), and the tower was completed in 1565.
Since the 15th century, the Corsicans had built similar towers at strategic points around the island to protect coastal villages and shipping from North African pirates. The towers stood one or two storeys high and measured 12-15 m in diameter, with a single doorway 5 m off the ground that one could access only via a ladder which the occupants could remove. Local villagers paid for the towers and watchmen, known as torregiani, who would signal the approach of unexpected ships by lighting a beacon fire on the tower's roof. The fire would alert the local defence forces to the threat. Although the pirate threat subsequently dwindled, the Genovese built a newer generation of circular towers that warded off later foreign invasions.
On 7 February 1794, two British warships, HMS Fortitude (74 guns) and HMS Juno (32 guns), unsuccessfully attacked the tower at Mortella Point. The tower eventually fell to land forces, under Sir John Moore, after two days of heavy fighting. What helped the British was that the tower's two eighteen pounders fired sea-ward, while only the one six pounder could fire land-ward.
Vice-Admiral Lord Hood reported:
"The Fortitude and Juno were ordered against it, without making the least impression by a continued cannonade of two hours and a half; and the former ship being very much damaged by red-hot shot, both hauled off. The walls of the Tower were of a prodigious thickness, and the parapet, where there were two eighteen-pounders, was lined with bass junk, five feet from the walls, and filled up with sand; and although it was cannonaded from the Height for two days, within 150 yards, and appeared in a very shattered state, the enemy still held out; but a few hot shot setting fire to the bass, made them call for quarter. The number of men in the Tower were 33; only two were wounded, and those mortally.
Late in the previous year, the tower's French defenders had abandoned it after HMS Lowestoffe (32 guns) had fired two broadsides at it. Then the French were easily able to dislodge the garrison of Corsican patriots that had replaced them. Still, the British were impressed by the effectiveness of the tower when properly supplied and defended, and copied the design. However, they got the name wrong, misspelling 'Mortella' as 'Martello'. When the British withdrew from Corsica in 1803, with great difficulty they blew up the tower, leaving it in an unusable state.
The interior of a classic British Martello tower consisted of three storeys, sometimes with an additional basement. The ground floor served as the magazine and storerooms, where ammunition, stores and provisions were kept. The garrison of 24 men and one officer lived in a casemate on the first floor, which was divided into several rooms and had fireplaces built into the walls for cooking and heating. The officer and men lived in separate rooms of almost equal size. The roof or terreplein was surmounted with one or two cannon on a central pivot that enabled the guns to rotate up to 360 degrees. A well or cistern within the fort supplied the garrison with water. An internal drainage system linked to the roof enabled rainwater to refill the cistern. During the first half of the 19th century, the British government embarked on a large-scale programme of building Martello towers to guard the British and Irish coastlines. Around 140 were built, mostly along the south coast of England. Governments in Australia, Canada, Minorca, South Africa and Sri Lanka also constructed towers. The construction of Martello towers abroad continued until as late as the 1870s but was discontinued after it became clear that they could not withstand the new generation of rifled artillery weapons.
The French built similar towers along their own coastline that they used as platforms for communication by optical telegraphs. The United States government also built a number of Martello towers along the east coast of the US that copied the British design with some modifications.
Great Britain and Ireland were united as a single political entity, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, from 1801 to 1922, spanning the time during which the Martello towers were erected (the initial scheme started under the previous entities of the Kingdom of Great Britain and Kingdom of Ireland). Consequently the Martello towers of Great Britain and Ireland can be considered to have been part of a single defensive system, designed to protect the coastlines of the two main islands of the British Isles as a whole. This is most clearly visible on the south and east coasts of England, and the east coast of Ireland, where chains of Martello towers were built. Elsewhere in the world, individual Martello towers were erected to provide point defence of strategic locations.
Between 1804 and 1812 the British authorities built a chain of towers based on the original Mortella tower to defend the south and east coast of England, Ireland, Jersey and Guernsey to guard against possible invasion from France, then under the rule of the Emperor Napoleon. A total of 103 towers were built in England, set at regular intervals along the coast from Seaford, Sussex, to Aldeburgh, Suffolk. Most were constructed under the direction of General William Twiss (1745-1827) and a Captain Ford. Included in the scheme were three much larger circular forts or redoubts that were constructed at Harwich, Dymchurch and Eastbourne; they acted as supply depots for the smaller towers as well as being powerful fortifications in their own right.
The effectiveness of Britain's Martello towers was never actually tested in combat against a Napoleonic invasion fleet. They were, however, effective in hindering smuggling. After the threat had passed, the Martello towers in England met a variety of fates. The Coastguard took over many to aid in the fight against smuggling. Fifteen were demolished to enable the re-use of their masonry. The sea washed thirty away and the military destroyed four in experiments to test the effectiveness of the new rifled artillery. During the Second World War, some Martello towers returned to military service as observation platforms and firing platforms for anti-aircraft artillery.
Forty-seven towers survived in England, a few of which have been restored and transformed into museums, visitor centres, and galleries, some are privately owned or used as private residences; the remainder are derelict. A survey of the East Coast towers, in 2007, found that the remaining 17 were in a reasonable condition.
Tower 1 stands 200 feet up on the cliffs above East Wear Bay, Folkestone, within sight of Towers 2 and 3 below, all of which could have benefitted from the addition of moats. It was quite possibly used by the Coast Blockade and Coast Guard, but was described as unoccupied and missing its outer skin of brickwork as early as 1870. By the 1970's Folkestone Corporation had bought the tower and begun repair work. By the 1990's, the stucco cement rendering had been replaced with one of brick, and with a ground-level door and extra windows added at both floor levels, the tower became a residence.
Tower 2 is about 50 feet lower than No.1, and sited on a small knoll slightly further inland, where Wear Bay Road is now situated. The tower was purchased from Folkestone Corporation in 1964, converted into a house, with a swimming pool on the roof. This has been replaced with a full roof, similar to that on Tower 8. Extra windows have been added and the exterior coated with a coloured lime rendering. Surrounded by tall trees and situated up a private track, the tower is really only visible from a high position, such as the roof of Tower 3. The tower is a private residence.
Tower 3 stands on the cliffs above Copt Point and overlooks the harbour below. From the 1850's, the tower was home to a number of Coast Guards and their families. In1990 was purchased by Shepway District Council and later opened as the Martello Tower Visitor Centre. During renovation work in 1990, workmen clearing debris from the ground floor found a ramp sloping down into the foundations, leading into a pool of water, which was a natural source of water for the garrison.
Tower 4, along with its neighbours up to No.9, were all built into deep dry moats, and were situated within the Shorncliffe Camp area, up on the heights overlooking the coastline. The moat wall was built of stone, the moat itself having been half filled-in by 1948.
The tower was fitted with a large slate water tank, and became one of the towers, along with Nos. 27, 31 and 55 to have semaphore signalling apparatus to send messages installed beside it by 1820.
It was occupied by the Royal Observer Corps during World War Two, but does not appear to have been used since. The tower currently stands derelict covered in a thick layer of ivy in the garden of a private house. The brickwork appears to be in poor condition, although standing in its moat, covered in vegetation, very little of the tower can be seen.
Tower 5 stands high up, in line with Sandgate Castle, the keep of which was upgraded to save building Martellos on the lower level. The tower stands in the grounds of a secondary school and in 1934, plans were made to convert it into a chapel, but no work was actually done. In 1870, the original 24-pounder smooth-bore gun was still mounted, and it was recommended that it be re-armed with a medium gun. It currently stands derelict in its moat, with its doors and windows sealed up.
Tower 6 stands on the outskirts of Shorncliffe Camp, and was built just after the completion of the original barracks there. The tower stood near the camp officers' mess, which appears to have since disappeared. - The tower was reportedly in an unaltered state in 1948, although long abandoned since. The tower may have been manned during World War Two, as a small pillbox was built a short distance away to the east, at the top of the slope that leads down to a lower level. Today it actually stands outside the perimeter fence of Shorncliffe Camp, and can be accessed via a public footpath. With the door bricked up, the stucco gone, exposing the brickwork and the moat overgrown with trees and vegetation, the tower is in a state of neglect. It stands derelict and has probably not been used since the war.
Tower 7 was used as military stores for a number of years and was said in the 1970's to still have its original wooden floor, but the condition in which the tower has been for some years, having no window covering, has probably caused severe decay by now. The tower stands by the footpath that leads from Tower 6, and is surrounded by very dense vegetation, making it hard to find. - Like Tower 6, it too is now outside the perimeter fence of the camp, and similarly stands dilapidated in an overgrown moat.
Tower 8 is yet another tower which stands just outside the perimeter of Shorncliffe Camp, although further away than Towers 6 and 7. It stood derelict in its moat and bricked up for many years, even being half buried up to its door level to provide easier access until the 1980's. It has since been dug out and converted into a house, with a garden laid out in the moat. It has a new roof with windows built onto the parapet, and a wooden walkway to the door, built in a similar fashion to the original drawbridge across the moat. It bears an '8' as a house number.
Tower 13 stands on Hythe seafront in Western Parade and somehow survived the building of the promenade. The War Department sold it in 1906, and in 1928 it became a residence, bought by A.J. Glock, a builder from Streatham. Alterations were carried out and the tower named 'Place Forte'.
It was sold again in 1937, to an Edgar Wheeler, and in 1940 was used as an observation post to direct the cross-Channel shelling operations. It was sold yet again in 1960 to an architect, Ronald Ward, and used as a residence once more. Further conversions were carried out, notably the addition of large windows and the removal of internal brickwork to form cupboards. The walls were also made thinner to increase floorspace, and a viewing platform and extra room added to the roof.
Such alterations were permissible at that time, but are unlikely to be allowed to be carried out on a scheduled ancient monument today. The large number of windows looks incongruous for a Martello Tower, but doubtless admits far more natural light than the orignal narrow embrasures. The tower was renamed 'The Martello Tower', and mounted an original 24-pounder cannon outside, although this now appears to have been moved elsewhere.
PRIVATE PROPERTY.
1805
Built.
1906
Sold by the War Department.
1928
Used as a private house converted by A. J. Glock.
1937
Sold to Edgar Wheeler.
1940
Requisitioned and used as an Observation Post.
1960
Sold to Ronald Ward, architect, who converted it back into a house.
1962
1962 Field Investigation.
21st C
Beginning: Private house.
PRIVATE PROPERTY
Also on the Hythe Ranges with Tower 14, Tower 15 had a 'D' painted on it, although this appears to have worn off. Fort Sutherland originally stood between 15 and Tower 16. Standing further into the range danger area than Tower 14, the tower appears to be in a similar condition to its neighbour. The upper half of the brickwork is exposed where the outer skin of yellow brick has fallen off, although the general condition is reasonable. The tower is currently empty, and the importance of the Hythe Ranges to the Ministry of Defence means that access and public use of Towers 14 and 15 is highly unlikely in the foreseeable future.
Post Medieval Martello Tower. Scheduled Monument. Monument Number 463960. Grade II LIsted Building.
PRIVATE PROPERTY
1806
Built with two storeys, three levels, and a flat roof, measuring 42.6ft in diameter externally and standing 32.8ft high.
1963
Field Investigation.
1999
Scheduled.
21st C Beginning:
On the English Heritage Buildings at Risk Register.
Tower 16, being part of the low-level towers stretching across the beach at Hythe, and together with Tower 15 bolstered the defence of Fort Sutherland, a six-gun battery that stood between them. The tower had been undermined by the sea in autumn 1938, with seaward side collapsing onto the beach in large pieces and the remains washed away gradually over the years.
Standing on the low-level beach at Hythe, Tower 17 is probably that which was mentioned in the Times of February 1899:
The Martello tower near the Grand Redoubt at Dymchurch has been split in two by the action of the sea sucking away the shingle from the base.
The crumbling ruins with towers 18, 19, 20 and 21 behind, was printed in 'The Navy and Army Illustrated' in 1903. The Tower stood on 'E' Range, and was painted with a letter denoting this.
Tower 18 was undermined and washed away sometime after Tower 17, but before the Second World War. A photograph of Tower 17 collapsing with Towers 18-21 details printed in 'The Navy and Army Illustrated' in 1903. As with Towers 16 and 17, the remains were said to still be visible during the 1970's, although as public access to the area is strictly denied, any surviving remains cannot be visited.
Tower 19 once had an 'N' painted on it, denoting the range it was situated on. Unfortunately, it can no longer really be classed as standing, as its highest point is roughly 15 feet above the ground.
Fort Moncrief, a six-gun battery, was situated forward of and between Towers 18 and 19, but by 1873 had been encroached upon by the sea. Although its barrack buildings were intact, the parapet had been ruined.
At the same time, Tower 19 was predicted to have a "long existence" because it was protected from encroachment of the sea due to the ruins of the fort's parapet on the beach.
The tower was described by Commander Mead in 1948 as being on a slight rise in the beach, many of its neighbours having been washed away by this time. The tide eventually claimed Tower 19 in about 1975, and the majority of the masonry now lies in large masses on the beach in front of the base which still stands. It appears that some deliberate dismantling has taken place, possibly following intial collapse, as the brickwork is far too neatly cut off around the top of standing walls.
Tower 20's position was described as being "critical" in 1873, and it is believed that it was washed away during the early part of the century. A photograph published in 1903 , shows the sea encroaching towards the line of towers.
The immediate neighbour of the Dymchurch Redoubt, Tower 21 was the last in the line of the low-level towers, most of which were lost to the sea. As with Tower 20, the tower was described as being in a critical position in 1873, and believed to have been washed away in the early 20th century.
Tower 22 was built as a twin to Tower 23, and their purpose was to defend the Willop Sluice in Hythe Road, Dymchurch, in order to allow the sluice to be opened and flood the area if necessary.
Sandwiched between the sea wall and a road, Tower 22 was the second most recent south coast Martello to be lost; it was destroyed in 1956, in an era before Martellos were regarded as ancient monuments.
Kent County Council ordered its destruction to make way for road widening, and, despite being in poor condition, proved so resistant to conventional demolition methods, that after several days of failure the Army was called in to use explosives. Even then, problems were experienced. After the smoke cleared from the explosion, it was found that the tower still stood. It took several explosions to finish Tower 22 off.
Tower 23 was built to support Tower 22 in guarding Willop Sluice and was said by Commander Hilary Mead in 1948 to have the appearance of the garrison having marched out a few weeks earlier. Mead also photographed the original 24-pounder cannon lying on the firing step on the roof. The interior condition was such that Tower 23 was used as a guide when the restoration of Tower 24 was in progress. Tower 23 was itself restored externally in the early 1970's at a cost of £4,500. A ground-level door was knocked through the seaward wall, and by the 1990's the tower was being lived in.
Tower 23 has a new roof extension and was put up for sale for £850,000 in 2004.
Grade II Listed Building.
1806
Built measuring 30ft high with walls 5.5ft thick. A magazine was on the ground floor with two rooms above it.
1948
Good condition.
1962
Field Investigation.
1970's Early:
Externally restored at a cost of approximately £4,500.
1970
Scheduled.
1990's
Lived in.
2004
For sale for £850,000.
Tower 24 was paired with Tower 25 and they were built to defend the main Marshland Sluice. By the time of the 1841 Census, the tower was occupied by various Coast Guards and their families.
Tower 24 may have been occupied during the Second World War, but in the event, none of he Dymchurch towers were modified at this time, as happened to Tower 3 and some of those in Sussex.
The tower was first opened to the public as a museum in 1969, and remains as a museum of Martello Towers, owned by English Heritage. It is currently the only tower solely devoted to the history of the Martello Towers.
After again being used by the Coastguard up until 1959, the tower was acquired by the Ministry of Works and restoration work was begun. The internal timberwork was found to be rotten, and that of Tower 23 used as a guide. A new floor of the correct pattern was installed, and room partitions added.
Martello Tower, lookout, coastguard station. Scheduled Monument. Monument Number 463770.
1806
Built standing 30ft high with walls measuring 5.5ft thick.
1841
Occupied by families of coastguards.
1959 Until:
Used by the Coastguard.
1963
Field Investigation.
1966
Restored by the Ministry of Works.
1969
Opened as a museum by English Heritage.
1996
Scheduled.
21st C Beginning:
Good condition.
Tower 25 defended the Marshland Sluice with Tower 24. It stands in a car park and by 1988 was in poor condition despite having been restored externally at the same time as Tower 24.
The roof and central pillar are missing for some inexplicable reason, but a replacement roof has been put in. It appears to have a manhole in it, as daylight can be seen by looking upwards through the windows.
By 1991, the stucco was being stripped off prior to work being carried out. Restoration has now taken place, and the tower has had its stucco rendering replaced. A new door has been knocked through at ground level, as the wooden floor is missing. New windows have been put in, although vandals have taken to breaking them. The vegetation growing on the roof and round the base has also been removed. Tower 25 is possibly the only empty tower that is regularly maintained, whereas others are just left to deteriorate.
Tower 26 guarded the Globsden Gut sluice gates along with Tower 27, although the sluice had become disused by 1870. The sea had encroached towards the tower, and so groynes and an apron were built to protect it. The structures were themselves being washed at high tides by 1870 and the Report on Coastal Defences (compiled in 1870, but not submitted until 1873) predicted that Tower 26 will probably soon have to be abandoned. The report subsequently stated that the tower was demolished in 1871.
Built to guard Globsden Gut sluice gates, Tower 27 was the last Martello in Kent, before the chain continued into Sussex. (The Dungeness promontory was not defended with Martellos due to the loose shingle and the fact that the surrounding marshland could be easily flooded, providing a cheaper means of defence).
The tower was one of the four fitted with semaphore signalling equipment by 1820, the others being Towers 4, 31 and 55. By the 1840's, the Coast Guard seemingly occupied the tower. On June 15, 1847, the Chief Boatman of Tower 27 was ordered to dispose of the tower's donkey (used to carry water and stores) as the cost of forage was too high. He was to exchange the animal with another used at Lydd Coast Guard Station (which was deemed too vicious), and sell it at public auction in Dymchurch!
However, the above story conflicts with the Report on Coast Defences, which states that Tower 27 was demolished in 1841 in consequence of the advance of the sea.
Two redoubts were constructed into the south coast Martello chain to act as supply depots for the local Martellos, and were originally described as 'eleven-gun towers'. It was originally proposed to build a four-gun tower at Dymchurch, but this idea was revised at the Rochester conference of 1804.The other redoubt was at Eastbourne.
Dymchurch Redoubt was built between 1806-1809 to the same specifications as its Eastbourne counterpart, although Dymchurch does not have any caponiers. (Caponiers are blockhouses in the moat that allowed the garrison to cover the entire ditch with defensive musket fire - Eastbourne Redoubt has five).
Dymchurch also underwent significant re-fortification during the Second World War, bunkers and pillboxes adorning its parapets. The gun platforms were encased in concrete for machine-guns to be mounted, artillery emplacements constructed and an observation post erected.
Monument Number 463948
GridRef: TR 1587 3400
Redoubt Eastbourne
Eastbourne Redoubt is a circular coastal defence fort at Eastbourne, East Sussex, on the south coast of England. It was built in 1805 as part of the British anti-invasion preparations during the Napoleonic Wars. Visitors to the Redoubt can now explore the fortress, discovering the stories of the people who lived there throughout its 200 year history.
Description
Redoubt Fortress Eastbourne, Casemates No.2 & No.3 The redoubt is a circular structure, measuring 224 feet (68 metres) in diameter and is built almost entirely of brick with some granite facing. The lower tier is composed of a ring of 24 casemates or vaulted chambers, which open into a central parade ground. Casemate 11 was the main magazine for the redoubt, casemate 8 was modified in the 1870s as a cook house and casemates 23 and 24 were altered in the 1880s to provide a detention room and two cells.
The upper tier above the casemates forms the terreplein or gun platform, which has a tall parapet pierced by granite-faced embrasures for eleven guns. Beside each gun position is an "L" shaped expense magazine which held a supply of ammunition for the guns to use in combat and could also be used as a shelter for the gun crews during an enemy bombardment. The low roof of these magazines forms a banquette or fire step so that the garrison could fire their muskets over the parapet in the event of an infantry attack. The parapet is also pierced by the main gate, which was originally the only access to the redoubt.
The redoubt is surrounded by a ditch or dry moat which is 30 feet (9 metres) from the top of the parapet and 25 feet (7 metres) wide. On the far side of the moat, a glacis or earth ramp slopes away to ground level.[5] Both the moat and the glacis have been removed on the seaward side during construction of a sea wall and promenade in 1890. The floor of the ditch is traversed by five caponiers or covered galleries with loopholes that allowed the defenders to fire at any attackers who had reached that point. These are unique in any of the circular redoubts and are thought to have been added in the mid-19th century. Access to the main gate of the redoubt is across a wooden drop bridge, which is a modern reconstruction of the original, built in 2003 with help from the Royal Engineers. A second entrance from the ditch was created in 1957 by inserting a large doorway through the scarp wall into one of the casemates.
History/Origin
The decision to build the redoubt was made at a conference held in Rochester on 21 October 1804, to discuss defence against Napoleon's planned invasion of the United Kingdom, preparations for which were gaining momentum on the opposite side of the English Channel. The meeting, which was attended by the Prime Minister, William Pitt the Younger, agreed to adopt a revolutionary scheme to build a chain of mutually-supporting circular artillery towers along a stretch of the Channel coast where the French were thought to be most likely to land. The scheme had been devised by Captain William Henry Ford of the Royal Engineers and championed by Brigadier-General William Twiss who commanded the Royal Engineer Southern District. The original plan called for 83 Martello towers, each mounting a single heavy gun, at intervals along the coast and three 11-gun towers at Sea Houses (Eastbourne), Rye Harbour and Dymchurch. In the event, 74 Martello Towers were actually built and plans for the 11-gun tower at Rye were abandoned. The 11-gun towers, which came to be known as circular forts or grand redoubts, were intended to act as barracks and stores depots for the rest of the Martello chain, as well as formidable fortresses in their own right.[8] A third redoubt was later constructed at Harwich in Essex to support the Martello chain built to defend the east coast; although broadly similar, it differs in some details from the south coast redoubts.
Construction and the Napoleonic Wars
The contract to build the redoubt at Eastbourne was awarded to William Hobson. Five million bricks were brought around the coast by barge from London for the project and others were made locally. Work started on 16 April 1805, but a report by Brigadier-General Twiss to the Board of Ordnance in May 1808 recommended that the money to settle Hobson's account be withheld until all the work was completed. The structure was built on a raft of compacted chalk laid directly onto the natural shingle.It was constructed almost entirely of brick, over 50,000 being used in a single course. Cavities within the structure were filled with shingle. The redoubt was initially armed with 24-pounder guns on traversing carriages; although there are embrasures for 11 guns, only 10 appear to have been mounted. These were replaced shortly afterwards by longer ranged 36-pounder guns, after fears the redoubt could be bombarded at a distance by heavier French weapons. By the time that the redoubt had been fully armed and garrisoned, the likelihood of an invasion had become very remote and the guns were only fired in anger once; in 1812 two shots were fired at a passing French warship but missed.
Later 19th century developments
By the 1830s, Europe was experiencing a long peaceful period and the garrison consisted of only seven gunners and a gate keeper, together with their families. The main role of the redoubt was as a barracks rather than a fortress, with troops being stationed there for a few weeks at a time while using nearby training facilities. Although it was intended for 350 men, it is thought unlikely that more than 200 could be accommodated at any one time. Despite this, the armament of the fort was progressively improved throughout the century. In 1853, the 32-pounders were replaced by 68-pounder smoothbore guns. In 1859, the Royal Commission on the Defence of the United Kingdom which had been set up by Lord Palmerston to review Britain's fortifications, reported that the redoubts and Martello towers were "not an important element of security against attack". Nevertheless, by 1873, the armament had been increased to four 8 inch rifled muzzle loaders and three 110-pounder rifled breech loaders, together with two of the older 68-pounders. Various improvements were made to the living conditions in the barracks including the addition of a cookhouse in the 1870s and a latrine outside the main gate in the 1880s.
The World Wars and later
The model village which was an attraction inside the redoubt from 1957 to 1975. During the First World War the military police used the redoubt as a headquarters and temporary gaol. Following this, Eastbourne Borough Council purchased the redoubt for £150 with the plan to turn it into a venue for leisure activities. The only part of the plan to be implemented was in 1934; the construction of a new bandstand in the gardens just to the west of the redoubt and an associated colonnade to shelter the audience, which was built over part of the moat. During the Second World War, the army requisitioned the building to use for storage. The remaining artillery pieces were sold for scrap. In 1944, anti-aircraft guns were mounted on the gun platforms to counter passing V-1 flying bombs. In 1957, the redoubt was leased to an entrepreneur named Benjamin White, who created a model village on the parade ground and constructed a new entrance from the moat, with a staircase that gives access from the promenade. The bandstand colonnade was converted into the Blue Grotto Aquarium. The model village was vandalised and then removed in the 1970s, and the aquarium closed in 1996.
Access and events
The redoubt and cafe is open to the public between April and mid-November, every day from 10 am to 5 pm. Access to the gun platform and the parade ground is free. There is an admission charge to visit the inside of the fortress, which includes the regimental museums of the Queen's Royal Irish Hussars and the Royal Sussex Regiment, with the Sussex Combined Services military collection. The fortress has an excellent events programme, including films, lectures, tours, stargazing and ghost nights. It encourages families to visit, has permanent children's area and through the school holidays runs daily events to keep children entertained.
History
95th Rifles re-enactors firing whilst kneeling and in the Plunkett position In 1793, the French revolution reached climax when the Revolutionary Government issued orders to execute King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. Two weeks later, on 1 February, the French republic declared war on Great Britain, which then braced itself for invasion.
At that time British land-based defences were woefully inadequate as Great Britain had always relied on the Royal Navy for its defence. To prepare for invasion in 1794 British Parliament purchased a large piece of land at Shorncliffe, the obvious place for initial fortifications to be built as it was just 20 miles away from the French coast, so close, in fact, that the locals could see the smoke from the camp fires of Napoleon's waiting army.[1] Later further defences were added to the Kent Coast including the 28-mile-long Royal Military Canal, started in October 1804 and finished in June 1805, which stretches from Cliffend to Seabrook. Also Martello Towers were built between 1805 and 1808 to bolster the defences.
Colonel William Twiss, a military engineer, designed the redoubt. Once built, the site became home to the 43rd (Monmouthshire) Regiment of Foot, 52nd (Oxfordshire) Light Infantry Regiment, the 95th Rifles, and the light infantry brigades who Sir John Moore trained when he was stationed there in 1802.
The Shorncliffe System
The units stationed here during the Napoleonic wars greatly affected military history form this point onward. The light infantry trained at Shorncliffe were a new breed of soldier more akin to the soldiers of the modern British Army than their contemporaries. Using the "Shorncliffe Method", devised by Lt-Col Kenneth Mackenzie, the soldiers were taught to think for themselves and act on initiative. A high proportion of them were literate, which was unusual for the time. Moreover, in an age when many officers received no training, the light infantry officers drilled with the men. Their battlefield tactics were the embryonic emergence of current military manoeuvres, often fighting in skirmish formation ahead of the British main battle line.
In the Victorian era the Redoubt was converted to a dwelling for the camp Commandant. Many of the bricks used in the construction of the house were reused from the original Redoubt building.
Construction
There have been many different maps of the Redoubt through the ages as the site was reshaped and redesigned for different functions and changing military tactics. The one aspect that has always remained the same is the earthwork outer walls. The only slight change made to these was on the seaward side during the Victorian era where the wall was lowered so that the Commandant and his wife could look out to sea.
The method of construction of the earthwork walls was totally different from that of earlier earthworks. In earlier walls the earth was merely dug out and piled so that the wall would be formed (Figure 1). This would lead to the topsoil being at the bottom and the stonier substrate being at the top. This method of construction was optimal before the widespread use of cannon. The design of the Shorncliffe walls was different, and showed careful forethought and engineering. The turf was lifted and put to one side, followed by the topsoil. The stony substrate was then used to create the core of the wall, and a layer of top soil was placed over it and compacted. Then a further layer of stony substrate was added with another layer of top soil to cover it. It is surmised that the turfs were then placed at the bottom of the mound to create extra stability and to promote growth of the grass for protection from the weather. This method of construction leads to a wall with strong foundations better able to withstand cannon fire than previous earthworks.
The defensive ditches dug around the Redoubt were about 5 metres deep. With the earthen ramparts beyond, the Redoubt was well defended.
Some maps show heavily fortified magazines, but archaeological digs have failed to find them. It turns out that the maps were more guidelines for the construction of a much larger star fort which was never built due to the change of infantry tactics brought forward by Colonel Coote Manningham and Sir John Moore.
Shorncliffe Army Camp remains nearby and is still in use. The Redoubt itself has fallen into a state of disrepair.
Sandgate Castle was built in 1539 by Henry VIII to defend the lower shore of Sandgate, as part of the second major coastal defence scheme to be implemented in Southern England. (The Roman Saxon shore forts were the first, the Martello Towers being the third.) Parts of the outer expanses have been lost to the sea over the centuries, but the circular keep survived at the top of the beach. This was converted into a sort of Martello Tower, and meant that a tower did not need to be built on this lower stretch of the coast, the local towers all being high up on the cliffs slightly inland.
Now privately owned this 16th Century castle was updated with a Martello Tower in 1805 but does not form part of the numbered sequence of Martello Towers. It is in line with Martello Tower 5, which is located on much higher ground.
The Castle is an artillery fort originally constructed by Henry VIII between 1539 and 1540, as part of the same series of defences as Sandown, Deal and Walmer Castles, but altered again for defence purposes in 1805.
It comprised a central stone keep, with three towers and a gatehouse. It could hold four tiers of artillery and was fitted with a total of 142 firing points for cannon and handguns.
The keep was turned into a Martello tower; when the work was completed, it was armed with ten 24-pounder (11 kg) guns and could hold a garrison of 40 men.
The castle had begun to suffer damage from the sea by the early 17th century, and by the middle of the 19th century, the receding coastline had reached the edge of the castle walls.
The high costs of repair contributed to the government's decision to sell the site off in 1888. It was initially bought by a railway company and then passed into private ownership.
The Royal Engineers' Experimental Committee attended at Hythe on Monday, and proceeded to carry out their operations against No. 10 Martello Tower, which had been condemned at the instigation of the Seabrook Estates Company (Limited), who contemplate, when the new branch from the South- Eastern line of railway is completed, building here a splendid watering-place that shall out rival Scarborough in the beauty of situation, if it does not in the beauty of popularity. Martello Towers are Very unsightly structures, and would certainly be any thing but an ornament to the Seabrook marine parade of the future. It was, therefore, highly necessary that such obstruction should be removed; its removal also afforded another opportunity for our military engineering school to experiment on a large scale and determine the effect of a supposed improved explosive force. Gun-cotton has been, we know, an invaluable agent of the engineer. From time to time it has been improved, and when scientifically handled it one of the best explosive powers we have at command, its force, weight for weight, being nearly fives times greater than gunpowder, as was demonstrated a short time back at Hastings.
The quality selected for this experiment was nitrated gun-cotton of Waltham Abbey manufacture, and the quantity was fixed at 150 1bs. weight, subdivided into three heaps. In the centre of each heap were placed two fuses surrounded by a primer of loose dry gun-cotton, the great bulk being wet. charges were fired by means of a service pattern dynamo-electric machine, the connecting wire being about five hundred yards long. The interior of the tower was denuded of all fittings, and the doors and embrasures were not, some supposed, stopped up to give greater effect to the explosion.
By the time appointed (two o'clock) the whole of the arrangements were completed, and with the aid of a company of the Royal Engineers from Shorncliffe and the Kent County Constabulary the ground in the vicinity of the tower was cleared of curious spectators who had assembled to see the novel sight. The signal being given, a loud report followed, and the tower was suddenly enveloped in a dense mass of smoke. As this gradually cleared the tower became visible, at a distance appearing a little unshapely, and with some terrific rents and cracks in its wall, but still a dangerous-looking tower. A close inspection showed that the effect of the explosion had been to sever the walls longitudinally from base to crown in eight different places. A tremendous crack extended the whole of the circumference, about two-thirds the total height from the ground, and the upper portion was displaced as if had received a sudden wrench. Masses of brickwork, weighing several tons, had become detached, and fallen on the beach on the southern side. The centre pillar of solid brickwork which supported the roof was entirely demolished, and with it, of course, the roof had disappeared. The tower had apparently been skinned of its outer course of bricks for a considerable distance on its upper surface, while the base of the building, with the exception of the longitudinal cracks previously mentioned, appeared little worse for the strong convulsion it had undergone. It is noteworthy that none of the fragments appeared to fly any great distance, and although several articles and debris were scattered about in the immediate neighbourhood of the tower, none appeared disturbed by the explosion.
The explosion hardly effected the result desired, but this is more owing to the accidental sustaining force lent by each separated mass of brickwork to the other after the explosion than any want of force in the agent employed. The experimenting committee appear to have arrived at the exact quantum of explosive matter required for the demolition of this class of building, and that their theory should be thus far borne out by actual result is a matter of congratulation both to them and the country.